This site was created and moderated by Mr. Elbaum, a government and U.S. History teacher at Adlai E. Stevenson High School.

Monday, October 30, 2006

The second coming?





In 1858, a virtually unknown state legislator from Illinois seized the attention of the nation with his message of national unity. “A nation divided against itself cannot stand”, the young lawyer said, and he followed up his speech with a run for the open US Senate seat.

We all know the rest. Abraham Lincoln defeated John Breckinridge in 1860 (despite having won NO southern states). His opponents said that he was too young (only fifty-one in 1860). They said that he was inexperienced (eight years in the Illinois legislature). Despite these claims, most found Lincoln’s optimism about bridging the gap between North and South refreshing. Unlike most Republicans, Lincoln did not advocate war with the South. History students can recite how the story ends. Lincoln’s election leads to the secession of South Carolina, which led to Fort Sumter, which led to the Civil War. Four years and nearly six-hundred and fifty thousand deaths later, the institution of slavery was over and the Union was one again.

Fast forward to 2004. An unknown Illinois legislator named Barack Obama takes the stage in Boston to make the biggest speech of his life, a speech that will propel him into the national spotlight. In his speech, the young lawyer proclaimed that “there is no liberal America and there is no conservative America. There is only a United States of America”. The “audacity of hope” was the modern day “house divided” speech. . Four years later, the whispers of “Obama in 08” have turned into shouts.

Obama was against the war in Iraq in the months leading up to invasion in 2003. His detractors say he’s too young. He’ll be forty-seven in 2008. They say that he’s too inexperienced. He’ll have served the people of Illinois both on a state and a federal level. Unlike Lincoln, we don’t know how his story ends. Lincoln’s election led to a victory in the U.S. Civil War. According to David McCullough, “history is a guide to navigation in perilous times”. The country and a volunteer army rallied behind Lincoln as he secured Atlanta, Vicksburg, and Columbia. Perhaps it will take an unknown, untested, young lawyer from Illinois to secure Baghdad, Ramadi, and Fallujah.

Your thoughts?

8 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

An interesting comparison. I never would have thought to compare those two. Obama may be a skilled politician, but even he can't win Iraq.

7:47 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

OBAMA PRESIDENT '08!!
I LOVE HIM

8:55 AM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

We shouldn't even be in iraq right now, and despite that obama didnt vote i dont believe that he wants us to be there. If elected president i believe he will pull the troops immediately. Look what lincoln did, he freed the slaves, the comparion between the two is very close, but what will obama do that will compare to lincoln freeing the slaves? My guess get rid of nuclear iran

8:57 AM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

wow stacy you have some great political imput....real inspiring

8:59 AM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is a good lesson not to underestimate a young, inexperienced candidate. If history repeats itself this may be a good change in '08

9:02 AM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

elbaums new blog topic... when are politicians going to stop bashing eachother in the commercials and talk about what changes their going to make instead...all ive heard about is what was she thinking??? not what are you going to do for us

9:03 AM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The two are very similar in background. It is quite feasable that obama will take office. I agree with jim b, we shouldn't even be in Iraq right now.....but we are. We need someone who cares about the people in office. Politics has become a beauty contest. Unlike most, it sounds like Obama isn't just patronizing his audience....he's sincere. That is what made Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, Golda Meir, and people like that such a great speakers and leaders. I think obama's run will end like Lincoln's. I hope he wins, it's time for a change.

12:23 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

One big difference, Obama isn't crazy. Maybe Lincoln wasn't either when he first ran.

11:58 AM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home