This site was created and moderated by Mr. Elbaum, a government and U.S. History teacher at Adlai E. Stevenson High School.

Saturday, November 18, 2006

Our Democracy’s Hypocrisy? You can bet on it



In July, moments before the 109th Congress recessed, the House of Representatives signed a bill (317-93) that is the most serious attempt to eliminate online gambling. To make sure that the law would be enforced, the resolution took aim at the institutions that makes online betting work: the credit card companies (the online institutions are all headquartered outside of the US, even though half of their customers are American). You can’t bet online without using the plastic, and credit card companies would be subjected to heavy fines if they allowed their holders to make bets online.

This could be the end of virtual poker games and online sports betting.

As we always do on Patriot of ’76, let’s look at both sides of the argument. Online gambling makes betting your savings away that much easier, which can foster addictions and create major financial problems. It’s terrible that a person can throw their money away in the vain hope of becoming an instant millionaire….

PO76 has a few questions: 1) What hotel do you recommend staying at in Vegas (can’t afford Wynn yet)? 2) What is the little lotto jackpot at right now? 3) What horse or dog track is within driving distance?

It seems like the when the government can regulate (i.e. Tax) a betting institution, it has no problem allowing it to flourish. Does the government ensure that people aren’t addicted to gambling before they’re allowed to buy lotto tickets? Does the government make sure people can afford to lose before letting them double down on elevens at the blackjack table, or by taking “Santa’s little helper” in the fifth?

It seems like in these instances, Americans are given the freedom of how to spend their paychecks. If you take your money to the track or to the craps table, you know there is a substantial chance that you will be making a donation to the “house”. So why can’t you get that same freedom in front of your computer?

According to Christian Capital Advisors, the online gambling industry brings in about twenty billion dollars per year. Remember, all of those institutions are headquartered offshore (mostly Jamaica, United Kingdom, and the Bahamas). If Uncle Sam can’t get a slice of the pie, then nobody can play.

Let’s address the bigger picture. Congressman and Senators believe that gambling is dangerous, and if people can’t gamble online than perhaps they’ll turn their attention elsewhere. How can this line of reasoning work when there are so many other ways for someone to bet that are completely legal?

In 1918, the 18th amendment was ratified, which made the production and consumption of alcohol illegal. Speakeasies and smugglers flourished, and the 21st amendment conceded the fact that enforcement of prohibition was impossible. If online gambling becomes illegal, perhaps our new speakeasies will be our neighbor’s basement, where the buy in is one hundred dollars and the dealer calls the ante.

7 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Illegalizing online gambling is not something the government should dictate. Besides, how can you make online gambling illegal without banning cigarette and alchohol production and sales? It is a slippery slope. Therefore, the responsibility and trust is in the hands of the individual. It is up to the individual to gamble responsibly as it is to drink and smoke responsibly (of age). It is my belief that ridding online gambling will not render addiction obsolete. People who do not gamble responsibly need to seek help to treat the root of the problem. Therefore, eliminating online gambling would merely be a band-aid for a larger problem. Let it exist for those people who use it responsibly and who make good choices...

10:47 AM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Madelyn,

Are you crazy? The government is in place to protect its citizens. That's why we have speed limits, stop signs, and, while, our entire criminal justice system. If "trust the individual" became the way our government worked, why even have any laws?????

10:51 AM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

More frequent trips to Sin City must be in order now....

9:08 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ok, First off, im 100% against the government getting involved with free trade. That leads to socialist style government, and nobody wants to go there. Taking away gambaling is an atrocity. Just because people may have issues controlling themselves doesnt mean that it should be ban'd. Seriously, if you cant controll your gambling, getyourself some help. This would cause more problems than it would help. Illeagle "hacking" style rooms would spring up everywhere. Also picture yourself as an owner of a gambaling websight?

"hey umm... your now illeagle, sorry"

Thats bogus, the government shouldnt involve itself in things like this.

Heres an idea, lets cure aids!

-Archangel

10:26 AM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ok, First off, im 100% against the government getting involved with free trade. That leads to socialist style government, and nobody wants to go there. Taking away gambaling is an atrocity. Just because people may have issues controlling themselves doesnt mean that it should be ban'd. Seriously, if you cant controll your gambling, getyourself some help. This would cause more problems than it would help. Illeagle "hacking" style rooms would spring up everywhere. Also picture yourself as an owner of a gambaling websight?

"hey umm... your now illeagle, sorry"

Thats bogus, the government shouldnt involve itself in things like this.

Heres an idea, lets cure aids!

-Archangel

10:26 AM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am against government involvment as well. But as a response to "angryamerican", without putting any value on the peoples' decisions, we are contradicting everything we stand for. If we lose the right to make our own decisions, then we are no longer FREE people. I also agree with madelyn in reference to her point about alcohol. If you continue to make the use of alcohol a subject individual choice, you must do the same with gambling. Though I don't gamble personally, I am against the government intervening.

2:25 PM

 
Blogger Unknown said...

"If Uncle Sam can’t get a slice of the pie, then nobody can play."

Nice metaphor!
I hope that online gambling DOES become illegal. I don't have a problem with the occasional bet, but I do have a problem with parents that I hardly see spending their free hours playing poker on the computer.

They hog the damn computer.

The rational side of me knows that the chances of winning a profit while gambling is SEVERELY slim. So why bother?

Does gambling assist in economic growth? Does gambling create love, happiness, satisfaction...anything? I don't think so.
It's the rush, the sudden eruption of adrenaline that pumps through the veins, it's initially appealing.


Blech.

--Hannah

9:07 PM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home