This site was created and moderated by Mr. Elbaum, a government and U.S. History teacher at Adlai E. Stevenson High School.

Tuesday, February 13, 2007

Tough men, tough question..













As General George Washington took the oath of office in April of 1789, the fate of the newly formed United States was unclear. Washington’s popularity has never been matched (he still holds the distinction of being the only President elected unanimously by the electoral college- a feat he accomplished twice). The nation was bitterly divided, in tremendous debt, and was being held together by a remarkably weak Army and no real Navy. Washington had no precedents to follow, no judicial branch, and faced a looming conflict with various Indian tribes.

As Abraham Lincoln took the oath of office on March 4, 1861, America was far from a group of United States. South Carolina had seceded from the union, and, together with six other states, formed what became known to be The Confederate States of America. The nation was falling apart, ideologically and literally. Lincoln’s first executive decision was whether he should re-supply Fort Sumter, located along the Charleston Harbor. Doing so would be seen as an act of war. Avoiding the problem would be seen as granting legitimacy to the states in rebellion.

FDR took office in times of great peril as well. In 1933, the nation was in the heart of the Great Depression. Unemployment was astronomically high. As Banks closed, people lost their life savings, with farmers hit especially hard. In January of that year, a former WWI soldier named Adolf Hitler was appointed Chancellor of Germany. The very system of democracy and capitalism were at stake, as socialists gained power throughout Europe.

These three men took office during the nations most tumultuous of all times. However, let’s not underestimate the dangers our 44th president will face upon his or her inauguration in 2009. There are no signs that Iraq is improving, income gaps are at their highest since The Gilded Age, forty-six million Americans are uninsured, and (perhaps most importantly) Iran will be very close to having nuclear capabilities. Needless to say, a nuclear Iran would pose a tremendous, even unprecedented, threat against the US and our allies.

Is there a Washington, Lincoln, or FDR out there?

Do men make history, or does history make men? Which of these four presidents assumed the office at the most dangerous time? You can make a case for all four. Who gets your vote?

5 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good question--my vote goes to #44

7:20 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree. The looming threat of a nuclear iran and terrorism is more intimidating than the civil war or the great depression because it could potentially wipe out our whole country.

Unlike in the cold war when both sides were scared to "push the button", the oposing side doesn't have this fear. Terrorists are willing to sacrifice their own lives in order to harm others. That is some pretty ominous stuff.

11:35 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

First I think there is an argument to be made for Regan as a president who comes in under tough circumstances. Look at that, me giving a shout out to a conservative pres.!!!

You could also possibly throw Andrew Johnson in there, I mean how do you rebuild half of a nation? He didn't do it so he isn't recognized for doing anything but that has to be a pretty tough way to enter a presidency.

I find it hard to argue that any situation was tougher than Lincolns. I mean come on the nation quite literally split itself into two. Now I'm not taking away from Washington, whom I believe to have had the best cabinet the white house has ever seen. Nor FDR who takes over the country in the middle of the Great Depression.

Now do I think there is another one of these men to be president next. To that I have to say, ask me in 60 years. I mean it is impossible to tell how a president was during there term or even right there after. Look at Truman, one of the lowest Support/apporval ratings while in office and he is quickly moving up the list now at #7 on the historical rankings of presidents by average scholar rank.

Does this mean I am ambivalent to assesing a president while in office, no. It just means I don't think we know truly if they have done good or bad for our nation until we see how there time in office affects our nation many years after.

So like I said, ask me in 60 years how our 44th president compares to those 3 men.

11:52 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Not sure if this is completely conceivable..

but don't you think our upcoming President has a bit of a handicap?
Honestly, anyone following Bush has a significant vantage!

Not to say that our nation's outermost circumstances are preferable...

but at least he/she won't have the additional challenge of competing with our previous President's performance.

7:33 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

George Washington owned hundred of slaves. I think real men are warriors, such as the slaves who ran away. The underground railroad... there's a place for warriors.

12:35 PM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home