This site was created and moderated by Mr. Elbaum, a government and U.S. History teacher at Adlai E. Stevenson High School.

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

Finals Time, Semester II

"Men died for us. We have an obligation to live our lives with honesty and integrity to honor their sacrifice"
- Rick Davis

Click here for Questions 1-10

Click here for Questions 11-20

Click here for Questions 21-30

Click here for Questions 31-40

Click here for another version of Questions 31-40

Click here for questions 41-50

Click here for Questions 51-60

Click here for questions 61-70

Click here for another version of questions 61-70

Click here for questions 71-80

Click here for Questions 81-90

Click here for another version of Questions 81-90

Click here for Questions 91-95

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Review Guide for Final

For the American Government review guide, click Archives back to December, 2006

Sunday, May 13, 2007

What they'll remember about you...



Sen. Sam Brownback found out the hard way that Americans like candidates that share their values and interests. Often times, candidates must adapt their stump speeches to different regions and locales.

The GOP presidential hopeful drew boos and groans Friday at the Wisconsin Republican Party convention when he used a football analogy to talk about the need to focus on families.

"This is fundamental blocking and tackling," he said. "This is your line in football. If you don't have a line, how many passes can Peyton Manning complete? Greatest quarterback, maybe, in NFL history."

Oops, wrong team to mention in Packerland.

Realizing what he had said, the Kansas Republican slumped at the podium and put his head in his hands.

"That's really bad," he said. "That will go down in history. I apologize."
His apology brought a smattering of applause and laughter. He tried to recover, saying former Packer Bart Starr may be the greatest of all time, but the crowd was still restless.

"Let's take Favre then," Brownback said. "The Packers are great. I'm sorry. How many passes does he complete without a line?"

"All of them!" more than one person yelled from the back.

"I'm not sure how I recover from this," Brownback said. "My point is we've got to rebuild the family. I'll get off this."

Brownback’s gaffe was reminiscent of John Kerry in 2004, when the Democratic candidate called Lambeau Field “Lambert Field”(note: Kerry did still win the state).

Most Americans are not ideologues. They don’t carefully research each position of the contenders. Instead, they use shortcuts, or heuristics, to make their judgment.

Maybe next time Brownback is in Lake Geneva, he’ll pay homage to the man that Wisconsinites wish was running for President.

Tuesday, May 08, 2007

Contradiction?



John Edwards is an extremely rich populist.

If you think that sounds like an oxy moron, you’re not alone.

Edwards will release his financial disclosure later this week, a step frequently taken by presidential candidates. His advisors are leaking parts of it so Americans don’t see just how rich Edwards is in one fall swoop.

We know Edwards enjoys getting $400 haircuts

We know Edwards has an enormous house in North Carolina.

Today, we found out that Edwards worked for a hedge fund called Fortress Investment Group. The company claims to have $35.1 billion in assets under management.

Edwards is the same man that runs on the platform of eliminating poverty and providing health care to all Americans. He believes that the best way to achieve these goals is by raising income taxes on Americans making over $200,000 per year.

Is there a contradiction between campaigning against poverty while working for a hedge fund that is designed to make rich people richer?

If nothing else, it certainly is a distraction from Edwards’ message.

Rightly so?

Friday, May 04, 2007

Last AP Review Session

Join us for our final REVIEW Sunday night May 6. The 2Regular Guys will be bringing their radio review to Bruce DuMont’s show Beyond the Beltway on WLS radio, 890 AM.

Beyond the Beltway with Bruce DuMont is a "live" weekly two-hour nationally-syndicated radio program that takes America's political pulse and provides a fresh and balanced perspective of national politics. The program is produced every Sunday night from 6:00 PM to 8:00 PM (CT) at the Radio Hall of Fame Studios in The Museum of Broadcast Communications in Chicago.

JOIN US ON THE AIR LIVE BY CALLING
1-800-723-8289
OR EMAIL BRUCE DuMONT AT
BTB@museum.tv

The radio version of Beyond the Beltway is heard on more than 60 stations from coast- to-coast. Audio also streamed live every Sunday on ( WLS - Chicago) , WNOX - Knoxville, KCMO - Kansas City and WNTK - New London, NH.

For a live audio/video stream click here : BeyondtheBeltway.com.

Wednesday, May 02, 2007

Too much government?



The oldest debate facing this country remains what exactly is the role of government? The same question that Hamilton and Jefferson debated centuries ago in Philadelphia is still raging in state houses all across the country.

The Illinois House overwhelmingly approved a statewide smoking ban in public places Tuesday that would eliminate a confusing patchwork of local laws and leave smokers in every community with one place in common to light up—outside.

The House's 73-42 vote sent the measure to Gov. Rod Blagojevich, who indicated he would sign legislation that advocates say would make Illinois the 19th state to impose a broad smoking ban.

Supporters said the bill would fix the crazy-quilt of smoking bans passed by municipalities after the legislature in 2005 gave them the power to adopt local rules.

The state legislation would prohibit smoking in all public buildings and in most businesses and government vehicles. Smoking would be illegal in bars and restaurants, as well as places ranging from student dormitories to private homes in which businesses open to the public are operated.

Opponents contended the legislation would destroy already troubled small businesses, such as mom-and-pop bars that provide customers a place to party down and light up.

The U.S. surgeon general issued a study last year that found there is no safe level of exposure to second-hand smoke and that even brief exposure can cause immediate harm. The study found that non-smokers exposed to second-hand smoke at home and work increased their risk of developing heart disease and lung cancer by up to 30 percent.

The report said the only way to protect from the dangers of second-hand smoke is to eliminate indoor smoking.

Blagojevich said he would likely sign the ban, adding that he "would be shocked if there were something in that bill that I didn't like and would keep me from signing it."

Government intrusion or maintaining public safety?


Too much government?

Tuesday, May 01, 2007

Impeachment?




Rep. John Murtha, a Pennsylvania Democrat, wants to bring the troops home from Iraq, and he says he is willing to impeach President Bush to do it.

When, in November 2005, Murtha, a decorated Vietnam veteran and pro-military moderate, called for getting U.S. troops out of Iraq, it became a very big deal.

That was 18 months ago. The troops are still there, even more are headed that way, and Murtha wants action now. He said, "Mr. President, the public has spoken. There's three ways or four ways to influence a president. One is popular opinion, the election, third is impeachment and fourth is, and fourth is the purse."

Asked if impeachment was possible, Murtha said, "I'm just saying that's one way to influence a president".

Yes, it is one way.

The Constitution says the House of Representatives can impeach the president, vice president and other civil officers for "treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors."

If John Murtha actually thinks George Bush is a criminal -- and thinks he can prove it -- then he should go ahead and try to impeach him. After all, President Bush did authorize the NSA to issue warrantless wiretaps.

It takes a simple majority vote in the House of Representatives to impeach and a two-thirds vote in the Senate to convict.

According to Politico Roger Simon, Democratic arguments against impeachment could be summed up in two words: President Cheney.

That alone ought to make George Bush impeachment-proof.

Impeachment for purely political reasons?

It’s not unprecedented